What Makes Collaborations across a Distance
نویسندگان
چکیده
Scientific collaborations are increasingly being conducted at a distance, despite the many factors that make collaboration at a distance difficult. We focus on the discipline of cognitive science because it is both young and highly interdisciplinary, thus potentially increasing both the rewards and difficulties of collaboration at a distance. Using questionnaire data from practicing cognitive scientists, we examined the impact of distance on who is likely to collaborate, the success of the collaboration, and the process of collaboration. There were few differences between those collaborating at a distance and locally. Surprisingly, collaborations at a distance were more successful than collaborations conducted locally. Distant collaborations depended crucially on frequent face-to-face contact. We conclude with a discussion of how these results change our understanding of collaboration in general and, in particular, of collaboration at a distance. 529 Modern scientific collaborations frequently are carried out by researchers who are geographically distributed, in part because necessary resources for the research are often distributed geographically, and in part because scientific collaborations continue after collaborators change academic or research institutions. In this chapter, we examine the nature and consequences of scientific collaborations that are collocated or distant. We ask whether they function differently than local collaborations. Understanding how such collaborations function might provide better insights in the nature of collaboration more generally. There are some recently developing pragmatic reasons to study the differences between local and distant collaborations. With the development of the Internet and various computerized collaboration tools, it is becoming possible to achieve some of the features of face-to-face collaboration from a great distance. These products beg the question of what features of local collaborations are particularly important to duplicate. Certainly, not all features of these collaboration tools are worth the expense, and some features may actually hurt the collaboration The goal of this chapter is to examine role of distance in the collaborative process within the domain of cognitive science. We ask if scientists working at a distance differ from those working locally, whether working across a distance changes the collaborative process, and what scientists do to make collaborations across a distance succeed and continue. To answer these questions, we present survey data collected from cognitive scientists at a recent conference. Three Distinctions among Scientific Collaborations The way that collaborations function is likely to depend upon the needs and relative skills of the collaborators. Three factors are likely to play an important role. …
منابع مشابه
Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour.
We are an intensely social species--it has been argued that our social nature defines what makes us human, what makes us conscious or what gave us our large brains. As a new field, the social brain sciences are probing the neural underpinnings of social behaviour and have produced a banquet of data that are both tantalizing and deeply puzzling. We are finding new links between emotion and reaso...
متن کاملTrends in Scholarly Collaboration
Abstract Researchers in science and engineering have a long tradition of collaboration, and increasingly carry out these collaborations across geographical distance. Similar trends exist in industry, where virtual teams are increasing in frequency. While we know that such dispersed collaborations are difficult, there is growing evidence of success. The physical and biological sciences have led ...
متن کاملBibliographic Resources on Collaborative Service Delivery Arrangements
Based on an extensive study of 237 cities within five states, Collaborative Public Management provides an in-depth look at how city officials work with other governments and organizations to develop their city economies and what makes these collaborations work. Exploring the more complex nature of collaboration across jurisdictions, governments, and sectors, Agranoff and McGuire illustrate how ...
متن کاملWhat Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education
This article reports findings of a meta-analytical study of research on distance education. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that affect the effectiveness of distance education. The results show that although the aggregated data of available studies show no significant difference in outcomes between distance education and face-to-face education as previous research reviews sugg...
متن کاملDeveloping Student Collaborations across Disciplines, Distances, and Institutions
Because quantitative biology requires skills and concepts from a disparate collection of different disciplines, the scientists of the near future will increasingly need to rely on collaborations to produce results. Correspondingly, students in disciplines impacted by quantitative biology will need to be taught how to create and engage in such collaborations. In response to this important curric...
متن کامل